ASEAN Circular Economy Stakeholder Platform (ACESP) ASEAN Circular Economy Stakeholder Platform (ACESP)
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Partners & Supporters
  • Our Work
  • Circular Economy
    • What is the Circular Economy
    • ASEAN Frameworks
  • News
  • Events
  • Knowledge Hub
  • Contribute
ASEAN Circular Economy Stakeholder Platform (ACESP) ASEAN Circular Economy Stakeholder Platform (ACESP)
ASEAN Circular Economy Stakeholder Platform (ACESP) ASEAN Circular Economy Stakeholder Platform (ACESP)
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Partners & Supporters
  • Our Work
  • Circular Economy
    • What is the Circular Economy
    • ASEAN Frameworks
  • News
  • Events
  • Knowledge Hub
  • Contribute
Uncategorized

Natural Environment and Circular Economy? Contemporary Findings from ASEAN

  • April 21, 2023
  • 2 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0
Topic: Circular Economy
Type: Research
Country: Multi-Country
Language: EN
Year: 2019
Visit: International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change

In this study, the ASEAN region’s circular economy is compared to the region’s natural ecosystem. The idea of the natural environment is used to reflect on elements like carbon emission, renewable energy consumption, total natural resource rent, and plant species for better understanding.

The literature on the circular economy and environment for both developed and developing countries has been significantly and recently updated by this study, it may be said. The results of the study also provide a great grasp of how environmental factors and CE relate to ASEAN. Researchers, academicians, and students in the pertinent domains are strongly encouraged to use this research as supporting documentation.

The generation of municipal garbage per capita, the generation of municipal waste per GDP, and the creation of waste per DMC are estimated as direct measurements of the circular economy (CE).

Panel regression models, such as OLS regression, fixed effect, and random effect models are used for the empirical inquiry, and their coefficients are compared using Hausman and Lagrange multiplier tests. It is discovered that the use of renewable energy and carbon emission (factor 1) has had a considerable impact. In contrast, under a full sample of the study, TNRR and NOE have significant positive and negative influences on the generation of waste (per GDP). The effects of GHGE, REC, and PS are favourably significant for the third CE indicator (production of trash per DMC), however, they are only positive and significant for the OLS regression estimator. Additionally, this study has considered the first and second log differences for all three measures of CE with the causal impact from all indicators of the natural environment.

For Full Text Please visit: https://www.ijicc.net/images/vol8iss8/8819_Saengchai_2019_E_R1.pdf

 

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Share 0
Share 0
Share 0
Send 0
← View All Resources

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Join our community and get our latest news, events and knowledge delivered to your inbox.

ASEAN Circular Economy Stakeholder Platform

Institute for Population and Social Research Mahidol University, Salaya Campus
999 Phutthamonthon 4 Road, Phutthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom 73170 Thailand

Get Location
ceplatform@acsdsd.org

Follow Us

Privacy Policy | Terms of use

© 2023 ASEAN Circular Economy Stakeholder Platform.
All rights reserved.

© This website was created with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of ACESP and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union.

Input your search keywords and press Enter.